walkboston

One Minute, One Slide: Walking & Communicating in the time of COVID

Below is a “One Minute, One Slide” presentation shared by a member of the WalkBoston staff.
Text provided is as prepared for this year’s annual event on September 23, 2020 on Zoom.

*Can’t read the text on these screenshots? Click here or on the image to access the archived Mailchimp message.*

Brendan Kearney

I’m Brendan Kearney, WalkBoston’s deputy director.

March 18th, we launched a weekly storytelling email effort that we called “Keep Walking”

It started as a way to share positive news as we collectively grappled with the unfamiliarity of life in quarantine. It quickly became more than that though, and we now know that a limited run email series is a way that we can delve deeper into a topic area related to walking.

It gave us a chance to pause and formulate what has been important to us each week: from exploring new rail trails (Issue 3), to rediscovering neighborhood walking maps (Issue 4); from learning about the animals that coexist on the streets around us (Issue 6), to the blooms of flowers along streets and a resurgence of gardens and CSAs (Issues 8 and 9); from sharing streets for physical distancing (Issue 11), to walking to support main street businesses (Issue 14).

As Stacey spoke about earlier, Keep Walking also became the space where we committed to being better advocates and working to end the structural racism that perpetuates violence against Black people (in Issue 12). We have always believed that safe walking is a fundamental right, but it is not one that we all share equally: a “safe street” does not mean the same thing for every person (Issue 13).

We are grateful to everyone that reached out and shared your stories, too: including the way walking has become a critical release valve.

To read any of these issues, head to walkboston.org/keepwalking

WalkBoston testimony to a joint meeting of the MBTA Fiscal and Management Control Board and the MassDOT Board

Testimony as prepared for joint meeting of the MBTA Fiscal and Management Control Board and the MassDOT Board, September 21, 2020. During the COVID-19 pandemic, public comment to the Boards is via short phone messages that are played to the Board members at the beginning of each meeting. The I-90 Allston Project was on the agenda for the meeting and the following comment was provided by WalkBoston as a phone message.

Good morning Board members.

This is Wendy Landman, WalkBoston’s member of the I-90 Task Force and a veteran of the many-year I-90 environmental process.

I would like to begin my comments by thanking Secretary Pollack for specifically calling out walking and biking access to the Charles, and planning for dual paths along the Charles in her recent Boston Globe op ed.

As the Board and MassDOT turn to selecting a preferred alternative for the project I would like to remind you of the following sentence from the purpose and need section of MassDOT’s I–90 Scoping report:

…“including service that provides a north to south connection through the Project Area as well as for options that do not preclude future intercity rail service and transit service on the Grand Junction Rail line.”

Of the three alternatives now under study by MassDOT, only the at-grade and hybrid options rebuild the little Grand Junction bridge over Soldiers Field Road which would permit two–track rail service along the Grand Junction line to be added in the future. Because the highway viaduct option does not rebuild the little Grand Junction bridge, future Grand Junction service would require very significant, expensive and disruptive construction in the throat area again – essentially precluding such service. Hence, the highway viaduct option does not meet the project’s purpose and need as defined by MassDOT.

Among the alternatives under study, we believe that the at-grade alternative will best meet the project’s full purpose and need. We are pleased that conversations are now underway between some advocates, pro bono design teams and MassDOT to identify an at–grade alternative that serves all modes and all users of this critical transportation project AND helps restore the health and vitality of the Charles River and the Charles River Reservation.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the project.

Dismantling the White Definition of Walkability

In 2020, many White Americans are awakening to the enduring reality of structural, anti-Black racism in the United States. Some are seeking to become “allies”—a call for White people to display racial solidarity—by educating themselves and engaging in the fight for racial justice. Others are unsure of where or even how to begin. One mistake many new allies can make is putting “racial justice work” in a box, separating it from the other facets of their lives. A White-centric perspective has embedded itself in every component of American daily life. Walkability advocacy is no different.

This is evident in the very definition of walkability. Ask any White transportation planner, researcher, or advocate what makes a city walkable, and it’s more than likely you’ll get a similar answer: the built environment. Research supports the idea that the built environment can strongly affect our perceptions of a place, and thus our behavior. But walking is also deeply personal, political, social, and cultural. Our experience of walking through public space is determined just as much by our identities as by a space itself. Black people walking are twice as likely to be hit by a car (Streetsblog 2017). They are more likely to be stopped, ticketed, and searched by police (U.S. DOJ 2018). They face frequent harassment by White road users, who sometimes deem them “not to belong,” even in their own neighborhoods (Elijah Anderson, The Guardian, 2018).

One can build the “perfect” street, but failing to address the deeply unjust social systems that design, implement, and govern those streets, renders walking a luxury enjoyed by some; not the deeply human right it must be for all. These entrenched systems cannot be toppled overnight. The first step that advocates can take in the long journey of walkability reform is to abandon the internalized bias that there is only one true form of walkability, and that it is some version of, for example, Copenhagen. The obvious flaw in that definition is that Denmark is a majority-White homogeneous society. Broadening the idea of walkability requires recognizing that no two people experience public space in the exact same way. It also means that approaches to promoting walkability must center on diversity, equity, and inclusion, just as much as they center on wider sidewalks and lower speed limits. If you’re a White walkability advocate, and all of your ideas about walkability come from other White walkability advocates, consider who will feel safe and comfortable in the public realm you design and who might not.

In my own work as a White walkability advocate, I am taking all of my cues from people of color, in particular Black women. In practice, this sometimes requires that I abandon solutions that make sense for me and my experience, and take a step back when I think I might have the answer. Undertaking the internal work of uprooting White supremacy from my own neural wiring means constantly questioning my own judgment. The truth is that I will never be able to devise solutions that incorporate all perspectives. As part of that commitment, I am recognizing when my perspective is valuable, and when it is not, never assuming I have all the answers; that Black voices should be at the center of each and every transportation policy decision; that I will intentionally be aware of who I am drawing inspiration from and who I am listening to. With these commitments top of mind, I’m going to get to work and be a better advocate.

Lily Linke just completed her Master’s in Urban and Environmental Policy and Planning at Tufts University. Her thesis, a podcast on walkability and race, will be released on September 8. footnotespod.com

This article was featured in WalkBoston’s August/September 2020 newsletter.
————————————————————————————————
Join WalkBoston’s Mailing List to keep up to date on advocacy issues.
Like our work? Support WalkBoston – Donate Now!
Connect with us on Twitter and Facebook

Letter from the Executive Director

The last five months have been like no other. As COVID-19 continues to paralyze our mobility and economy, people walk to maintain physical and mental health, commute to essential jobs, and connect with people from a safe distance. Never has it been more obvious that sidewalks—typically five feet wide—are too narrow as we try to stay six feet away from each other. For the first 15 weeks of our COVID-19 experience, our Keep Walking weekly newsletter chronicled new neighborhood discoveries and made you laugh with silly walking videos, songs with COVID-19-inspired lyrics like “Stayin’ At Home,” and uplifting messages to keep you going.

Then, George Floyd’s murder on May 25, 2020 once again forced us to confront the horrors of police violence against Black and brown people, and acknowledge that police brutality robs Black people of the fundamental right to walk their streets without fear.

WalkBoston’s mission—to make Massachusetts more walkable—converges with COVID-19 response efforts and the anti-racism movement.

In the midst of this public health crisis, we are advocating for the repurposing of street space so people can safely walk, run, and roll. With fewer vehicles on the road, we called for a rebalancing of street space to immediately serve those most vulnerable. WalkBoston worked with MassDOT, AAA, MassBike, and others to make a plea to drivers to slow down as traffic speeds soared after volumes plummeted. We know that walkability goes beyond safe crossings and wide sidewalks. Walkable main streets are lively community places whose vibrancy depends on the businesses along them. In the wake of COVID-19, their role has intensified—WalkBoston’s Main Streets Resiliency panel discussion brought people together to strategize on how to support their local businesses as they face economic challenges during the pandemic. (June 24, 2020 panel video available at WalkBoston.org)

WalkBoston continues to work in Black and brown neighborhoods where racism has led to disparities in the quality of the built environment. Our work takes us from the Gateway Cities to Boston’s Mattapan and Talbot Norfolk Triangle neighborhoods among others. Our approach in these places draws on the expertise and desires of residents, community-based organizations, and municipal staff. Our definition of safe public spaces and our experiences in public spaces as a predominantly-White staff is not the same as for Black and brown residents. We commit to do more to better understand, identify, and expose the racist processes and policies that continue to deprive Black and brown residents of the safe, connected public realm others enjoy. Look for an upcoming WalkBoston email series on racial equity and walkability.

We commit to being better advocates for Black communities, in addition to working to dismantle the system that perpetuates disparities in the built environment. As an organization, we are actively investigating how to make anti-racist strategies and mobility justice central to our mission, and have committed resources to hiring outside help to lead us through an internal racial equity analysis, to help frame our upcoming strategic plan. This process will take time, but we are dedicated to fighting for mobility justice and will share our completed concrete plan.

Stacey Beuttell, Executive Director